questions through City Manager Bitter, who confirmed that one-on-one discussions or
email communications were also welcome.
Next, Mr. Kozlowski walked through the current position in the budget calendar. He
shared that the council is presently at the Capital Improvement Plan work session
stage, with an operating budget work session tentatively scheduled for approximately
April 23rd, though he noted that date is not final. Mr. Kozlowski added that the budget
is scheduled for council approval at a council meeting in late May, tentatively around
May 19–21. Lastly, he shared that several steps in the process remain and that all
calendar dates listed are preliminary.
Next, Mr. Kozlowski presented a five-year history of general fund revenues and
expenditures. He noted that the surplus available for transfer to the Capital Project
Fund (Fund 350), to pay for capital projects, grew from $26 million in FY2022, to $38
million in FY2023, to $48.9 million in FY2024, before declining to $41.8 million in
FY2025—a drop of approximately $7 million largely attributed to the flat income tax,
changes to rental sales tax, and anticipated impacts from the San Tan Valley
incorporation. He projected that the FY2026–27 surplus available for CIP would further
decline to approximately $37.6 million. He also noted that the city's first six months of
FY2026 financials are tracking closely to projections, with revenues potentially running
a couple of million dollars higher, but broadly consistent with the projected figures.
Next, Mr. Kozlowski presented the FY2026–27 one-year CIP at $189 million. He
displayed a breakdown of the $189 million by funding source, which included the
Capital Project Fund (Fund 350), carry-forward amounts, HURF funds, the revenue
bond, and Capital Improvement Plan grant capacity. Lastly, Mr. Kozlowski shared how
Public Works represents the largest share of requested projects and that Financial
Services appears large due to its management of contingency funds and futures
planning placeholder projects.
Next, Mr. Kozlowski clarified that it was 176 and not 190 capital requests, which
brought the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan total to $1 billion. The next three fiscal
years are projected at $189 million, $197 million, and $176 million respectively. City
Manager Bitter reminded the council that all 10-year figures are expressed in today's
dollars and are updated annually to reflect current cost estimates and inflation. Mr.
Kozlowski also noted that not all budgeted amounts represent confirmed project
expenditures but also serve as capacity placeholders to allow the city to receive grants
or other external funds without running afoul of budget amendment restrictions.
Next, Mr. Kozlowski presented a list of project requests that were reviewed and
ultimately not included in the submitted CIP. He shared that ADA compliance efforts
were moved to the operating budget. Additionally, Mr. Kozlowski stated a proposed city
central warehouse was deemed premature given that future building needs and
locations have not yet been determined. Furthermore, he reported that the Heritage
Master Drainage and Roadway Plan was removed because those needs are addressed
through the development process. General discussion ensued regarding those
proposed capital improvement projects and others that were not included on the Capital
Improvement Plan.
Mayor Smith took the opportunity to address questions she had received from
residents following the council's recent discussion of strategic priorities, clarifying that
the strategic priorities are high-level focus areas, and that the specific CIP
projects—each linked to a strategic priority in the ClearGov tool—provide the detailed
timelines, costs, and funding sources that residents were looking for.
Councilmember Liermann asked when the public would have access to the Capital
Improvement Plan information. To which, Mr. Kozlowski explained that the documents