broader master plan trails network system.
Commissioner Robertson asked several questions about the retaining wall variance
(8-foot walls with 2 feet retaining and 6 feet screening), commercial nodes, density
allowances up to 24 dwelling units per acre, and whether the proposed units would be
rentals or for purchase. Mrs. Mason clarified that while high density residential allows
up to 24 units per acre, the development standards would prevent reaching that density
without returning for additional approvals.
Commissioner Yocum inquired about purple pipe infrastructure for non-potable
irrigation and wastewater management systems throughout the project.
Vice Chair Klob questioned the decision between Option A and Option B development
standards and noted concerns about the two roundabouts planned for SR 238, showing
concern for the way drivers will handle the roundabouts.
Commissioner Robertson observed that much of the advertised open space consists
of drainage areas and washes, which Mrs. Mason confirmed, noting the project takes
advantage of the V-Call wash to create walkable spaces with vistas.
Stephen Anderson, land use attorney with Gammage and Burnham, presented for the
applicant, explaining that Dozerland, LLC represents a Nebraska family seeking to
entitle the property for sale. He emphasized their agreement with all 10 staff conditions
and noted no community opposition, with no attendees at their neighborhood meeting.
Mr. Anderson clarified that the development standards were crafted specifically to
prevent apartment construction while allowing single family attached housing options.
He explained that Options A and B were designed to limit density and that any future
apartment development would require returning through the full PAD amendment
process.
Mr. Anderson highlighted that the project proposes 489 single family homes on 137
acres (approximately 3.6 units per acre) plus the single family attached area. Anderson
emphasized that 92% of the site would remain single family detached residential, with
only 8% (13 acres) designated for higher density attached housing.
Commissioner Thomas asked about the dramatic reduction in lot sizes from 7,000
square feet to 2,400-2,500 square feet in Options A and B. Mr. Anderson explained
this creates ownership opportunities for townhomes and patio homes rather than
apartments, spreading units across individual lots instead of vertical apartment
buildings.
Vice Chair Klob expressed significant concerns about housing diversity in Maricopa,
noting that 79% of lots in this development would be 45 feet wide or smaller,
accommodating only 30-35 foot wide homes. He worried about the abundance of small
lot developments limiting housing diversity and the lack of move-up housing options for
existing residents. He emphasized the community needs affordable housing in addition
to larger lot developments to attract executives, doctors, and other professionals.
Mr. Anderson responded that while the current proposal reflects market demand for
smaller lots, the PAD structure would allow for larger lots in the future if market
conditions change, though it prevents increases in density.
Vice Chair Klob praised the attached product concept as desperately needed by the
community but expressed concerns about it potentially evolving into single family
rental rather than for-sale housing. He noted the liability challenges with condominiums
and limited professionals willing to work on for-sale attached products.