were not included in the previous amendment approved in November.
Mr. Williams explained that the bill, which passed on March 31, 2025, amended
Section 9500.49 of the Arizona Revised Statues relating to administrative review and
approval. He added that the bill mandated that cities authorize administrative
personnel to review and approve site plans, development plans, land divisions, and
various plats without a public hearing. Mr. Williams iterated that while the city had
already implemented much of this in December, they had overlooked sections
regarding the zoning administrator's authority to send both minor and major
development review permits to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Williams clarified that major development review permits would still require on-site
posting and notification to property owners within 600 feet. He also noted that instead
of the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewing applications that staff cannot
approve, these would now go to the hearing administrator or hearing officer.
Mr. Williams explained that the proposed text amendments conform with several goals
in the general plan, including consistent enforcement of development codes, promoting
housing diversity, and streamlining permitting processes. He reported that the
amendment had been properly noticed since January 5, 2026, with no public
comments received to date.
Commissioner Klob asked whether the appeals section of the code would be updated,
as it still showed the Planning and Zoning Commission's involvement. Mr. Williams
explained that the changes approved in December hadn't yet been reflected on the city
website, but the current amendment was consistent with those previous changes.
Commissioner Klob also asked what responsibilities would remain for the Commission
following these changes. Mr. Williams responded that they would still review zonings,
plan amendments, text amendments, and conditional use permits. He added that the
Commission would have a major role in the upcoming code update process.
Commissioner Thomas asked if developers had complained about the time it takes to
get through Maricopa's review process. Mr. Williams emphatically stated that Maricopa
was known for its efficient processing of applications, unlike some other municipalities
in the valley that take much longer. He noted that developers celebrate Maricopa's
commitment to getting them through the process quickly and efficiently.
Commissioner Klob, confirmed that Maricopa processes applications much more
efficiently than some other valley cities, where cases can take up to 2.5 years.
Chair Singleton opened the public hearing. With no members of the public wishing to
speak, the public hearing was closed.
Motion to approve the minutes was made by Commissioner Thomas and
seconded by Commissioner Yocum. The motion passed unanimously
5.2
ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Discussion and possible action to elect a Chairman and
Vice-Chairman for the Planning Commission for 2026. DISCUSSION AND ACTION.
Mr. Williams explained that the Commission's code requires election of a chair and
vice chair every two years. He noted that the current chair has been in place for one
year, and there was a vacancy in the vice chair position. The Commission could either
keep the current chair and elect a vice chair or make changes to both positions.
Motion was made by Commissioner Klob to nominate Chair Singleton to
continue as Chair of the Commission. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Yocum. The motion passed unanimously.